|
Gartner's prediction that over 40% of agentic AI projects will be cancelled by 2027 reveals a sobering truth: the gap between AI enthusiasm and AI governance has never been wider. This month's articles chart the path from understanding what agentic AI actually is to establishing the accountability frameworks that make it sustainable.
I begin by stripping away the hype to reveal agentic AI's core truth: it's generative AI in a loop, where machines drive iteration instead of humans. From there, I expand the definition to compound loops that coordinate multiple AI disciplines simultaneously—machine learning, computer vision, and NLP working together to create exponential rather than linear value. The accountability gap article confronts an uncomfortable reality: whilst organisations race to delegate decisions to AI, the responsibility for those decisions remains firmly with humans who often lack the verification capability to ensure quality.
World models point to AI's next frontier—systems that don't just analyse what has happened but simulate what will happen next. And minimum lovable governance provides the operating principle that makes all of this work: not the smallest amount of governance you can get away with, but the smallest governance system that achieves necessary guardrails whilst being something people actually embrace.
If your time is limited, I particularly recommend the accountability gap piece. The pattern of AI-generated errors reaching courts, clients, and regulators is accelerating, and the strategic choice between augmentation and replacement carries consequences that many Boards haven't fully considered.
How is your organisation balancing the speed of AI adoption with the governance maturity needed to sustain it?
-Mario
|