Cookie Consent

I use cookies to understand how my website is used. This data is collected and processed directly by me, not shared with any third parties, and helps us improve our services. See my privacy and cookie policies for more details.

Tagged with: The-Great-Remaking

Ethical AI: When the Model Imposes Values Your Organisation Did Not Choose

Washington D.C. | Published in Board | 14 minute read |    
A brass compass set into a boardroom table, its needle pulled away from true north toward a glowing blue device, while a leather folder marked Values, Purpose, Integrity, Respect rests at the table's edge — a visual reframe of an organisation's values deflected off course by a standard built into its AI (Image generated by ChatGPT 5.4)

A foundation model arrives carrying a value system its provider built: what it refuses, how it frames a sensitive subject, how it resolves a question with reasonable views on either side. That standard, not the organisation’s, is the one in force, and it changes with each model version without the Board’s consent. System prompts, retrieval, guardrails, and fine-tuning constrain the imported standard but cannot re-author it. Organisations can choose to accept the provider’s ethics, reject the deployments where it bears on people, or build alignment the organisation owns. This article sets out how a Board makes that choice, deployment by deployment.