Cookie Consent

I use cookies to understand how my website is used. This data is collected and processed directly by me, not shared with any third parties, and helps us improve our services. See my privacy and cookie policies for more details.

Tagged with: Risk-Management

Shadow AI and the Case for an AI Amnesty

Llantwit Major | Published in AI and Board | 15 minute read |    
A corporate office environment showing contrasting scenes: shadowy figures using AI tools in darkness on one side, while the other shows transparent, well-lit collaborative AI usage, symbolising the transformation from shadow AI to governed innovation (Image generated by AI)

With a 68% surge in shadow AI usage and 54% of employees saying they would use AI tools even if they were not authorised by the company, Boards face a governance challenge traditional compliance cannot solve. This article presents AI amnesty as an important first step to minimum lovable governance - transforming hidden risks into strategic assets whilst capturing employee-validated innovation. When 95% of enterprise AI pilots fail to deliver measurable ROI yet shadow AI thrives everywhere, the path forward isn’t enforcement but structured disclosure programmes that build trust and position early adopters as governance standard-setters.

Why Boards Need to Watch the EU's General-Purpose AI Code of Practice

London | Published in AI and Board | 15 minute read |    
Abstract visualisation of regulatory divergence between EU and US AI approaches, showing two paths splitting from a central board decision point. (AI-generated)

The EU’s General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice, effective August 2025, signals a new era of regulatory divergence. While the EU sets transparency and systemic risk guardrails, the U.S. accelerates through deregulation. For Boards, the challenge isn’t choosing sides but mastering dual-track governance — turning regulatory complexity into strategic advantage.