Posts tagged with #governance set out how to ensure AI decisions align with organisational values through governance structures that balance agility with appropriate controls.
Following your AI amnesty programme, speed matters: employees who disclosed shadow AI usage expect enablement, not restriction - the post-amnesty window is critical. In this article, I provide a roadmap for transforming discoveries into governed capabilities that boost organisational productivity and reduce the risk of AI moving back into the shadows again.
With a 68% surge in shadow AI usage and 54% of employees saying they would use AI tools even if they were not authorised by the company, Boards face a governance challenge traditional compliance cannot solve. This article presents AI amnesty as an important first step to minimum lovable governance - transforming hidden risks into strategic assets whilst capturing employee-validated innovation. When 95% of enterprise AI pilots fail to deliver measurable ROI yet shadow AI thrives everywhere, the path forward isn’t enforcement but structured disclosure programmes that build trust and position early adopters as governance standard-setters.
AI governance is fragmenting into incompatible systems — Europe prioritising trust through transparency, America pursuing speed through scale, China maintaining control through integration — forcing Boards to choose rather than compromise. In this article, I explore the sovereignty trilemma and present three strategic stances for navigating these landscapes without fracturing your strategy.
The EU’s General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice, effective August 2025, signals a new era of regulatory divergence. While the EU sets transparency and systemic risk guardrails, the U.S. accelerates through deregulation. For Boards, the challenge isn’t choosing sides but mastering dual-track governance — turning regulatory complexity into strategic advantage.
In the race to deploy agentic AI, organisations face a fundamental paradox: they’re building tomorrow’s autonomous systems on yesterday’s infrastructure. Drawing from the cloud transformation journey, this article explores how the same legacy architectures that constrain agentic AI also present an unprecedented opportunity. By retiring technical debt, organisations can clear the path for technological change that will define the next era of business competition. For Boards, the choice is clear: deploy agents within existing constraints, or use them to architect the foundation for future competitive advantage.
You’ve built your AI Centre of Excellence. It’s governing multi-speed adoption, delivering value, and - as we explored in the previous article - scaling beyond pilots to enterprise transformation. But here’s the uncomfortable truth: the AI landscape will look radically different in eighteen months. Multi-agent systems, decentralised agent ecosystems, embodied AI, neurosymbolic reasoning, quantum-AI hybrids, cross-modal intelligence, federated AI networks, and artificial superintelligence will challenge every governance framework you’ve carefully constructed. Having achieved scale, this final article tackles the strategic imperative of continuous evolution: how to future-proof your AI CoE to govern these disruptive technologies whilst building the adaptive capacity to thrive on change rather than being disrupted by it.
The successful completion of your AI Centre of Excellence’s first 90 days marks an important milestone, but it also brings into sharp focus the next critical challenge. Whilst the AI Initiative Rubric has proven effective for pilot selection and early wins have demonstrated value, the transition from isolated successes to enterprise-wide transformation requires fundamentally different approaches. This progression from pilot to scale represents one of the most significant hurdles in AI adoption, demanding new structures, governance models, and ways of thinking that go well beyond what initial success required.
This sixth article in my AI Centre of Excellence (AI CoE) series transforms theory into practice with a comprehensive 90-day implementation roadmap. Moving from capability building to value delivery, it introduces the AI Initiative Rubric - a systematic pilot selection tool that ensures your first initiatives deliver Well-Advised value whilst strengthening Five Pillars capabilities. Complete with sprint portfolios, stakeholder engagement strategies, and common pitfall avoidance, this article provides the practical guidance needed to demonstrate tangible AI CoE value from day one.
The fifth article in my AI Centre of Excellence series provides a comprehensive guide to building essential capabilities across the Five Pillars. Moving from governance frameworks to practical implementation, it details how to develop capabilities that match your multi-speed AI reality - from transforming shadow AI into governed innovation, to creating comprehensive literacy programmes. Complete with a 90-day implementation sprint, maturity assessment tools, and practical templates, this article transforms theoretical understanding into actionable capability development.
In the first three articles of this series, we’ve established why Boards need an AI Centre of Excellence (AI CoE), explored the eighteen essential functions that drive AI success, and used the AI CoE Simulator to reveal the multi-speed reality of AI adoption. Now comes the critical question: how do you structure an AI CoE that can effectively govern this complex, multi-speed landscape?