Cookie Consent

I use cookies to understand how my website is used. This data is collected and processed directly by me, not shared with any third parties, and helps us improve our services. See my privacy and cookie policies for more details.

Tagged with: Geopolitics

AI Sovereignty: A Board's Guide to Navigating Conflicting National Agendas

London | Published in AI and Board | 15 minute read |    
Business executives in suits stand on a glass platform at a crossroads, overlooking three diverging roads leading to a classical European city in soft blue light, a futuristic American skyline with glowing data streams, and a Chinese metropolis with red-toned interconnected bridges, symbolising transparency, innovation, and integration. (Image generated by ChatGPT 5)

AI governance is fragmenting into incompatible systems — Europe prioritising trust through transparency, America pursuing speed through scale, China maintaining control through integration — forcing Boards to choose rather than compromise. In this article, I explore the sovereignty trilemma and present three strategic stances for navigating these landscapes without fracturing your strategy.