Tagged with: #enterprise-ai

Boards apply rigorous stewardship to physical assets: regular condition assessments, clear ownership, maintenance investment, impairment testing. Data assets — which increasingly drive competitive advantage — receive none of these disciplines. The gap isn’t technical; it’s governance. Accounting standards render data invisible on the balance sheet, so Boards govern it as though it doesn’t exist. This article argues for balance-sheet thinking applied to data, using the AI Centre of Excellence as the governance vehicle. For Boards, the question isn’t whether data belongs on the balance sheet; it’s whether you’ll steward it as if it does.

AI coding tools don’t close the expertise gap — they amplify it. Research shows senior developers capture twice the productivity gains of juniors, while a randomised controlled trial found experienced developers actually worked slower with AI than without, the hidden taxes of verification offsetting initial speed. This article explores the verification premium — and why Boards should ask not “can we use AI to write code cheaper?” but “do we have the verification capability to ensure AI-generated code creates value rather than debt?”

Forty-two percent of companies abandoned the majority of their AI initiatives this year — not because AI failed, but because organisations applied generative AI to problems better solved by traditional machine learning or deterministic automation. This article examines the recalibration underway as sophisticated adopters discover that LLMs excel at specific tasks but prove expensive and unreliable when mismatched to problem domains. For Boards, this shift presents an opportunity to right-size investments through hybrid architectures that match capabilities to problems, capturing value through strategic deployment rather than universal LLM adoption.

America’s 19GW power shortfall by 2028 is forcing hyperscalers to build their own generation, but the strategic insight is what happens next: surplus capacity transforms AI infrastructure operators from energy consumers into grid actors. This article examines how distributed generation reshapes the relationship between technology companies and national grids, exploring whether the UK’s smaller system enables transformation or creates concentration risk. For Boards, this evolution demands governance frameworks that address not just AI deployment but grid participation — before the transition forces answers upon them.

Minimum lovable governance marks a shift from episodic compliance scrambles to continuous, embedded oversight that people actually want to use. In this article I explain how governance can achieve necessary guardrails whilst earning adoption rather than resistance — like an arbour that guides growth without constraining it. For Boards, minimum lovable governance presents a practical path: the operating principle that makes AI governance work when traditional approaches simply get routed around.

World models mark AI’s shift toward true predictive power, allowing systems to simulate future scenarios and help businesses move from reacting to events to anticipating them. Drawing on emerging research, including Yann LeCun’s work on simulation-based intelligence, this article highlights the practical gains industries like aviation and finance are seeing in operational efficiency through these future-looking tools. For Boards, world models present a tantalising future: the opportunity to turn future insight into present advantage.

McKinsey’s 2025 research shows whilst 88% of organisations use AI, only 23% have successfully scaled agentic systems — and even fewer integrate disciplines beyond generative, limiting value to linear gains rather than exponential growth. In this article, I expand the agentic AI definition from “generative AI in a loop” to compound loops that coordinate multiple AI disciplines simultaneously, creating interaction effects that multiply capabilities, simplify governance through unified frameworks, and enable Boards to tackle broader business challenges for lasting competitive advantage.

Agentic AI has become this year’s poster child, dethroning generative AI as the technology everyone wants to discuss. Yet fundamental misunderstandings about what agentic systems actually do create barriers to successful adoption. This article demystifies the hype by revealing the core truth: agentic AI is generative AI in a loop, where the machine drives iteration instead of a human, making the strategic question not about technology sophistication but where to consciously transfer decision-making agency from people to systems, and at what scale.

The true AI governance challenge isn’t pilot failures – it’s that Boards’ six core concerns demand simultaneous orchestration yet receive sequential attention through project-level adoption. In this article, I show how these interconnected priorities form the proper diagnostic lens for AI governance, revealing why addressing them together as a whole rather than individually determines the difference between transformation and yet another failure.

Following your AI amnesty programme, speed matters: employees who disclosed shadow AI usage expect enablement, not restriction - the post-amnesty window is critical. In this article, I provide a roadmap for transforming discoveries into governed capabilities that boost organisational productivity and reduce the risk of AI moving back into the shadows again.